DeepSeek Harness Memory Plugins: Eight Options, Zero That Deliver Team-Grade Memory
Adopting a memory plugin without designing team governance locks you into personal recall; the survey's concrete takeaway is that you will still hand-build promotion and ACL logic, so factor that in before picking a backend.
DeepSeek Harness (DSH) treats memory as a processing chain across the agent lifecycle, with hooks like agent/pre-step, session/event, and turn/end. The survey groups plugins into three working modes: auto-recall injects memory before each step, on-demand retrieval leaves the model to call a search tool, and local-auditable options store readable files with candidate and verified states. Among the eight plugins, MemOS local and dsh-auto-memory fit personal use, OpenViking and Hindsight target project or platform layers, and MemOS Cloud and memsearch split between hosted API and Markdown-plus-Milvus retrieval. The survey's practical conclusion: every plugin solves personal or project memory, but none has public evidence of automatically turning multiple people's experience into shared, trusted rules. Teams need a separate governance layer for evidence, permissions, conflict resolution, and promotion.
The gap between personal recall and team governance is not a retrieval problem; every plugin optimizes recall, but none ships a permission, evidence, and conflict-resolution layer.
Auto-recall is a trade-off, not a win: it lowers the model's decision cost but increases noise and requires stricter permission checks.
The survey's repeated warning that local storage 'verified' does not equal team trust suggests the community treats memory correctness as a social process, not a technical feature.