Ollama vs LM Studio on a 24GB M6 Mac: MLX, Memory, and Locked Model Files Decide It
On Apple Silicon desktops, the runner choice determines model portability, memory footprint, and whether MLX acceleration is available. Ollama's resident service and blob storage clash with the tight memory budgets of 24GB machines, making LM Studio the practical pick for local GPU inference.
Ollama and LM Studio are not the same category of tool. Ollama wraps llama.cpp with its own model registry, CLI, and a resident API service; LM Studio is a GUI runner that ships both llama.cpp and Apple's MLX engine. On a 24GB M6 Mac, three differences decide the choice: Ollama stores models as black-box blob shards that no other tool reads, it lacks MLX, and its memory management stays opaque while LM Studio loads on demand and unloads on idle.
The downloaded 7.1GB Qwen model split into 789 shards cannot be read by other tools; LM Studio uses ordinary files in a readable directory. MLX gives 10-30% faster text generation, and LM Studio's JIT loading keeps a 24GB machine usable alongside a browser and IDE. The final configuration splits tasks: LM Studio for interactive and multimodal work, llama-server for long-resident tasks with KV cache quantization, cloud API for heavy models, and Ollama only for server or port-specific tooling.
Uninstalling Ollama was a two-line command that freed 7.1GB with no loss, since the blobs were already unusable elsewhere. Ollama remains the easiest onboarding tool for beginners and a natural fit for Linux servers, but on a memory-constrained Apple Silicon desktop, LM Studio's transparency and MLX acceleration win.
Ollama's model lock-in is a real portability cost: downloaded weights are trapped in a blob format, making a local model a single-tool asset.
MLX is the decisive factor on modern Apple Silicon; the 10-30% speedup is broad enough to tip the choice, but the exact gap is model- and quant-dependent.
The memory budget shows 24GB is only comfortable for a 9B-class resident model with short context; bigger models require cloud offload, not tuning.
The practical division of labor by tool—GUI for interactive, llama.cpp for precise memory control, cloud for scale—is a useful way to manage local inference resources.