Agents Anywhere Puts Claude Code, Codex, and DSH on Your Phone: A Mac mini Test
A long agent run no longer has to stall on a "should I execute?" prompt until someone walks back to the desk; the same session can be answered from a phone. The trade-off is operational: session data may transit a hosted server, and anyone with sensitive projects needs to plan around self-hosting or accept that boundary.
Agents Anywhere keeps the heavy machinery on a work device. Claude Code, Codex, or DeepSeek Harness runs on the Mac or server, while a Connector service exposes the session, files, and terminal to desktop, mobile, and web clients. The phone is a control surface, not a second development environment; closing it doesn't stop the agent, and reopening the session resumes the same timeline. The work device must stay online, and a sleeping or crashed machine still takes everything down.
A real run on a Mac mini showed the value. Claude Code analyzed the disk and found about 27GB of reclaimable space, with 17.6GB recommended as the priority, while correctly advising against deleting fresh Rust/Tauri build directories. The results, including tables and paths, appeared on the phone, and the "should I execute?" prompt could be answered from there. A caveat: AI can list candidates, but regenerable caches cost time to rebuild, so a human should still review paths and impact before approving.
The workbench also consolidates session management across multiple agents and machines, which matters once a developer juggles Codex, Claude Code, and DSH. It does not merge their contexts or make agents collaborate; it only gives a unified place to find a device, a project, and a session. Costs follow the original agent accounts, and session data may pass through or be stored on the server, so sensitive work pushes toward the MIT-licensed Docker self-hosting option.
An awkward "should I execute?" wait is what remote access removes, but session organization matters just as much: with several agents and machines, finding which window belongs to which task costs more time than the remote keystroke itself.
Multi-agent support unifies access only. It does not merge Claude's context with Codex's, and the human still decides which agent fits a task.
Disk-cleanup suggestions like the 27GB figure only become useful with a human cost check; a cache can be regenerated, but regeneration time is a real price, so "reclaimable" and "free" are different categories.
The privacy section draws a line that's easy to blur: execution happens locally, but session data can transit a server, so self-hosting is a data-boundary decision rather than a deployment preference.