跪拜 Guibai
← All articles
Open Source · News

HowToLiveBetter Puts a Price and an Evidence Grade on Every Life Decision

By 冬奇Lab ·
Read original on juejin.cn ↗ Google Translate ↗ Alt translation

The result is a transferable pattern for turning a body of practical knowledge into a queryable, auditable dataset: every claim carries a primary source, every judgment is labeled as a judgment, and AI assistants can answer from the text with citations. The China-specific legal and policy entries won't transfer directly, but the structure and tooling transfer cleanly.

Summary

HowToLiveBetter, created in September 2026 and already at 67,897 stars, is a 34-topic collection of 767 suggestions for living longer, spending less, avoiding legal trouble, and handling practical paperwork. Each entry follows a fixed format: cost in money, time, energy, or willpower; a plain-language statement of what changes; the underlying numbers; an evidence grade; a primary source; and the boundaries of who the advice applies to. Payoffs are kept in four non-interchangeable categories: lifespan, time/energy, money, and personal freedom, with no conversion between them.

HowToLiveBetter treats its content as software. Markdown files are the single source of truth; a static search page reads them directly, and build scripts regenerate an offline single-file HTML, a PDF, an EPUB, and an Anki deck on every content change. A companion skill lets Claude Code and Codex pull relevant entries, rank them by the book's cost-benefit method, and cite section and item numbers. Verification logs are public, and errata go through GitHub Issues.

Evidence and value are deliberately kept apart. A/B/C grades only say whether a number is checkable: 495 A-grade items come from meta-analyses, large cohorts, or RCTs; 220 are B-grade; 52 are C-grade. A separate cost-effectiveness tier, labeled as the author's own judgment and therefore only C-grade itself, ranks 123 items as extremely high value, 344 as high, and 300 as average. Legal and policy content follows mainland China rules as of writing.

Takeaways
— HowToLiveBetter holds 767 suggestions across 34 topics, with 2,531 links to primary sources.
— Each entry states a cost (money, time, effort, or willpower) and a payoff in one of four categories: lifespan, time and energy, money, or personal freedom.
— Evidence grades describe checkability, not importance: A (495 entries) means a specific figure from a meta-analysis, large cohort, or RCT; B (220) means research support without exact numbers; C (52) means personal experience or common practice.
— 88 entries are flagged as disputed, and A/B entries with disputes list opposing evidence.
— A grade does not imply causation; the book distinguishes randomized trials from observational studies and explains that relative percentages are not absolute counts.
— Cost-effectiveness tiers are explicitly a personal judgment, rated only C-grade by the book's own standard: 123 extremely high, 344 high, 300 average.
— The legal, medical insurance, and social security content follows mainland China rules as of the writing date.
— Releases automatically build a single-file offline HTML, a PDF, an EPUB, and an Anki deck from the same Markdown source whenever the text changes.
— The Claude Code/Codex skill retrieves matching entries, sorts them by the book's cost-benefit method, cites section and item numbers, and says 'not found' instead of inventing figures.
— The online search page filters by keyword, chapter, evidence grade, and whether an item costs money, time, or willpower; the 'extremely high value' filter returns 123 entries.
— The self-check page asks yes/no questions and points to items the reader has not yet done.
Conclusions

Separating 'is the number trustworthy' from 'is this worth doing' is the book's strongest editorial move. Evidence grade A does not make an item worth doing, and the cost-effectiveness tier is explicitly labeled a personal judgment.

Keeping lifespan, money, time, and legal risk in separate accounts avoids the false precision of converting everything into one metric. The result is a recommendation list that can honestly say a 12% mortality reduction and 500 yuan a year are not on the same scale.

Treating the book as a build pipeline is what makes a 767-item knowledge base actually maintainable. Single-source Markdown, auto-generated exports, public verification logs, and issue-tracked errata turn a document into something a community can keep correcting.

The 512 KB GitHub rendering limit forced the content into 34 files; that constraint is a reminder that platform limits often shape repository architecture in ways a design document never would.

The AI skill's value depends on the underlying text being structured the way it is. Because every entry has fixed fields and cross-references, an agent can answer with section numbers instead of hallucinating, which is not true for most unstructured documentation.

Concepts & terms
Evidence grade (A/B/C)
The book's scale for how checkable a number is. A means a specific figure comes from a meta-analysis, large cohort, or randomized controlled trial; B means research support without a precise number; C means personal experience or common practice.
Cost-effectiveness tier
A rating of whether an item is worth doing, based on payoff size and cost in money, time, energy, or willpower. The book explicitly labels the tier as a personal judgment, equivalent to C-grade evidence.
Plain-language summary (说人话)
A short, non-technical restatement of what a piece of evidence means for a specific type of person, placed before the raw statistics.
AI skill
A packaged set of instructions that lets Claude Code or Codex answer questions using the book's content as a knowledge base, citing section and item numbers and refusing to invent data.
Source: juejin.cn ↗ Google Translate ↗ Backup ↗