Building an Agent Harness from Scratch: Loops, Constraints, and Context Engineering
Most Agent frameworks abstract the loop away, but understanding the Harness — the explicit validate-execute-write-back cycle — is what separates a reliable, stoppable Agent from a prompt that occasionally calls a function. The hard constraints and context assembly patterns described here are the difference between a demo and something that can run unattended.
An Agent is not just a model — it is a model running inside a Harness that orchestrates tool execution, context assembly, and loop control. The Harness parses structured tool_calls, validates and executes them, writes results back into the message history, and requests the model again until a termination condition is met. Without this loop, most so-called Agents are just chatbots.
Hard runtime constraints — max steps, timeouts, pre-execution validation, and confirmation hooks for dangerous operations — keep the loop from spinning out of control. Context Engineering assembles every request from system prompts, tool schemas, conversation history, and on-demand injections like Memory, RAG, or SKILL documents. SKILLs are SOP-style Markdown files that the Harness can inject explicitly, by keyword match, or by letting the model request them as a tool.
MCP integration standardizes external tool discovery and invocation through a long-lived client-server connection, with the Harness acting as the Host that registers MCP tools alongside local ones in a unified registry.
Explicitly modeling the Harness as a separate runtime component makes Agent behavior debuggable and stoppable in ways that monolithic prompt chains are not.
The terminate flag on tool results is a small optimization that eliminates wasted LLM calls — a pattern worth adopting in any Agent loop that produces structured output.
Loading SKILLs through a tool call, rather than always injecting them upfront, keeps the context window lean and lets the model decide what SOP it actually needs.
Hard constraints like maxSteps and onConfirm are not optional polish; they are the only reliable guardrails when a model can hallucinate tool calls or loop indefinitely.