A Year Offline: Betting on AI, Becoming a Dad, and Going Back to School at 34
The post captures the real cost of an AI pivot inside a SaaS company: constant tool churn that erodes technical depth while sharpening customer-facing skills. It also surfaces the credential pressure that still shapes career decisions in China's tech market, where a degree can gatekeep roles that experience alone cannot unlock.
A year away from writing reveals a developer stretched across three life-changing fronts. His company's SaaS business went all-in on AI, pulling him into a relentless cycle of tool-switching — from Copilot to DeepSeek — where model updates constantly invalidated hard-won experience. Technical depth stalled at the application layer, but soft skills hardened: translating customer pain points without jargon and building systematic knowledge of vertical industries. At home, a pregnancy reshaped every daily decision, trading personal hobbies and a social life for a healthy baby and a brief, low-revenue experiment in the maternal-infant content track on Douyin and Xiaohongshu. Simultaneously, a blunt warning from an HR professional — "your educational background is a hard flaw" — pushed him into a part-time graduate program. The daily rhythm became dinner, one hour with the baby, then books and notes until late, sustained by a simple rule: if you're not smart, just put in more time.
Tool churn in AI is not just a productivity tax; it actively prevents depth by resetting expertise before it compounds, leaving engineers stuck at the integration surface.
The HR remark about a "hard flaw" in educational background reveals a hiring reality where credentials remain a hard filter, even for experienced engineers, pushing mid-career developers back into formal education.
Treating a baby as a child model and launching maternal-infant social accounts turns a life event into a low-stakes entrepreneurial experiment — a pattern of side-hustle thinking that surfaces even during personal upheaval.
The discussion splits over career strategy: one view questions why someone capable of getting into a top university wouldn't aim for a stable civil service job, while a counterpoint argues that the civil service exam is now harder than graduate school entry. A reply resolves the tension by suggesting a graduate degree makes the civil service exam easier, framing the author's path as a smart long-term play. Other comments are simple praise or requests for more detail on the author's background.
At over 30, you prepped for just one year and got into UESTC. With that kind of ability, why not take the civil service exam? [thinking emoji]
These days, the civil service exam is way harder than the grad school entrance exam.
Once you've got a grad degree, the civil service exam becomes easier.