Tencent's Hy3 Model and WorkBuddy Agent Run a Five-Case Gauntlet
A 295B MoE model that sustains nearly 500-step agent workflows and keeps data consistent across Excel, charts, and PPT changes the ceiling for unattended desktop automation. The two-week free trial lowers the barrier to stress-testing it on real office pipelines.
Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture of Experts model with 21B active parameters and a 256K context window, now integrated into Tencent's WorkBuddy desktop agent. A five-case test suite exercises four capability dimensions: front-end planning, tool use, long-range execution, and complex reasoning. The front-end cases demand pixel-precise Neo-Brutalist design and an animated MoE routing visualization; the tool-use case cross-references GitHub, HuggingFace, and OpenRouter for data consistency; the long-range case reads a folder of Markdown files, produces an Excel report with charts, and generates a 10-page Swiss-style PPT with a self-check step. The reasoning case requires a full derangement-problem derivation, a million-run Monte Carlo simulation, and a convergence plot against the exact solution.
WorkBuddy completed each case with correct parameter extraction, data-consistent cross-tool output, and a simulation error within ±0.001 of the mathematical exact value. The agent also handled context compression mid-task during the heavy PPT generation run. Hy3 is available with a two-week free trial on WorkBuddy.
Long-range agent tasks break most often on lazy estimation (word counts guessed instead of counted) and cross-tool data drift (PPT charts diverging from Excel source data); the self-check step in the prompt is a practical mitigation, not a formality.
High constraint density in a single prompt—colors, pixel-level shadows, hover params, corner-radius rules, inline SVGs—acts as a sharper planning test than multiple simpler prompts, because it forces the model to hold all rules simultaneously rather than process them sequentially.
Cross-referencing live web sources for model metadata is a cheap, repeatable accuracy test: the ground truth is known in advance, and the agent's willingness to report 'not found' instead of hallucinating is as informative as its extraction accuracy.
The derangement case ties reasoning to execution in a way that pure math benchmarks miss: a correct derivation followed by buggy simulation code or a mislabeled plot still fails the task, so the score reflects end-to-end reliability.